We have all this creativity in the Pagan community
And we have all this creativity in Women’s spaces.
So why are we STILL defining womanhood solely in terms of reproductive capability? The idea that Women’s Mysteries are solely available to people with uteri is very unfortunate.
Worse, it’s reductive. We need to start either rejecting or modifying the Gardnerian maiden/mother/crone model of Female Divinity (which, let’s face it, is based primarily on a Patriarchal and cissupremacist model of womanhood) and creating our own myths.
Goddesses are creative forces. Reproductively fertile yes in many cases, but there are also Goddesses who have never, ever had a child and whose roles do not revolve around childbirth. Even of Goddesses who are Mothers, their Motherhood is not all They are.
I call Brigid, the Morrigan, Epona. I call Athene, Artemis, Hera, Persephone. I call the Horned Lady, I call Panpsyche, I call Asushunamir and Inanna. All the Ladies of my faith, knowledge and practice - to guide a transformation of Women’s Paganism to a more creative and more inclusive future.
So mote it be.
34 Notes/ Hide
- peekadora likes this
- jaylyons likes this
- dragonpearl likes this
- semanthics likes this
- risu-of-anterra likes this
- harlotofthedesert reblogged this from thebookoftides and added:
- harlotofthedesert likes this
- shadyoaks likes this
- amadgirlinhermadwonderland likes this
- sowideasea reblogged this from thebookoftides
- sowideasea likes this
- booksofthought likes this
- lindentea likes this
- 73x5sunrises likes this
- notalwaysweak likes this
- blackwithstarlight reblogged this from lollygaggingandlassitude and added:
- mythotica reblogged this from widdershinsgirl
- tal9000 likes this
- lollygaggingandlassitude reblogged this from widdershinsgirl and added:
- cephalopuddle likes this
- sonneillonv reblogged this from widdershinsgirl and added:
- widdershinsgirl reblogged this from sonneillonv and added:
- widdershinsgirl posted this