A Widdershins Girl

fuck yeah sex education: Attraction – or lack thereof – to trans people

tobitastic:

As many continue to argue about the appropriateness of sexual preferences that exclude trans people, the ground being debated often shifts or slides so that we are not all talking about the same thing. For anyone continuing to defend a pattern of excluding trans people as potential partners as natural and free from social influence and internalized transphobia, I won’t tell you to stop arguing your case, but do so understanding these two points.

1 – No one wants to coerce or force you to date trans people.

When it is argued that a refusal to date trans people is influenced by internalized transphobic messages and other bigoted assumptions, it does not follow that the solution would be to date the people they hold bigoted assumptions and prejudices about. That would be a horrible experience for any trans person they date. The solution being suggested is to examine your romantic/sexual behavior for prejudicial influence and respond to what you find there the same way we already encourage doing so for all other areas of life.

2 – We’re not just talking about lack of attraction, but about holding attraction that you choose not to act upon.

In many cases trans status is not the first thing a person learns about someone else. By the time they do learn that person’s trans status, attraction - or lack thereof - is often already established. If they were never attracted to the person to begin with, then the person’s trans status had nothing to do with it. If they were attracted to the person up until discovering that they are trans, then “I’m not attracted to trans people” is clearly a convenient lie to hide the truth: that they are attracted to trans people, but for one reason or another they suppress those attractions. The fact that they can’t even acknowledge the attraction that was once there and feel the need to cover it up with this lie suggests that internalized shame and disgust for the attraction they held for a trans person plays a significant role in this dynamic.

Bottom line, please feel free to approach the conversation with:

“There are some trans folks I’ve been attracted to and strongly desired, but I just can’t go there because x, y, z.” Or with,

“It just so happens that I haven’t been attracted to any of the trans people I’ve met so, of course I have no clue about the folks I never knew were trans.” (For added clarity, mention the number of trans folks you’ve gotten to know well. Is it 5? 12? 50? 250?)

But please stop with the “I’m just naturally not attracted to trans folks, stop telling me I have to date folks I’m not attracted to.” That’s just not how it works and you’re being intellectually dishonest with yourself and with others.

fuckyeahsexeducation

this is a point i make to anyone saying that they’re not attracted to a specific group: examine why you aren’t attracted to them. Think of the societal messages you have received and really think about what your automatic judgments are. Then do some research and realize that a lot of the societal messages and pre conceptions you have are wrong.

Okay lots of truths in this. Lots. Falsehoods also.

It IS as simple as, “I’m just not attracted to X because I’m just not attracted to X.” If you are not attracted to X then you are not attracted to X. If you examine and disavow yourself of all that society has told you about X and you are still not attracted to X then that’s it. No one owes it to any other group to find them attractive or be attracted to them.

Where people are getting the idea that it’s intellectual dishonesty must be from space. Is it really that difficult to accept that someone just IS NOT attracted to you because they don’t find you attractive?

“I’m not attracted to trans women because I’m not attracted to trans women” rings hollowly considering the fact that people always say that AFTER having very obviously expressed and acted upon attraction to a trans woman. If you were attracted to her before finding out she was trans, but not after, the reason for the second is definitely worth exploring, and failing to do so IS intellectual dishonesty.

Source: tobitastic